Hi,

On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:07:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

> BTW, isn't possible to discriminate inside camlp4 if you are using the
> standard syntax or the revised one?

For the moment, no, but I could add something. I am thinking of adding
a string to "name" the current syntax. In this case, all Camlp4 syntaxes
should be named. For example, I added a Scheme-like syntax: it must be
named also.

The syntax "names" must be then "standardized" in Camlp4 if we want to
use these names in the syntax extensions.

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners