Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] autoconf and caml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...>
Subject: Re: pa_ifdef [Was: Re: [Caml-list] autoconf and caml]

On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:07:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

> BTW, isn't possible to discriminate inside camlp4 if you are using the
> standard syntax or the revised one?

For the moment, no, but I could add something. I am thinking of adding
a string to "name" the current syntax. In this case, all Camlp4 syntaxes
should be named. For example, I added a Scheme-like syntax: it must be
named also.

The syntax "names" must be then "standardized" in Camlp4 if we want to
use these names in the syntax extensions.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: