Browse thread
[Caml-list] mutually referencing compilation units
- Henri Dubois-Ferriere
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Henri Dubois-Ferriere <henridf@l...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] mutually referencing compilation units |
hello, given the banality i'm guessing this question has been asked before .. but i couldn't find any clear statement related to this inthe archive. So: Is the fact that two mutually referencing units can't be compiled supposed to be a Good Thing? It seems to be a consequence of the fact that order of .cmo's is relevant, and when that design decision was made i guess the restriction it entailed on mutual reference was not considered to be a problem. Thanks Henri DF ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners