Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] mutually referencing compilation units
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Henri Dubois-Ferriere <henridf@l...>
Subject: [Caml-list] mutually referencing compilation units
given the banality i'm guessing this question has been asked before .. but
i couldn't find any clear statement related to this inthe archive.

Is the fact that two mutually referencing units can't be compiled
supposed to be a Good Thing? It seems to be a consequence of the fact that
order of .cmo's is relevant, and when that design decision was made i
guess the restriction it entailed on mutual reference was not considered
to be a problem.


Henri DF

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: