Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Again on pattern matching and strings
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-10-24 (09:50)
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Again on pattern matching and strings
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:51:36AM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
> Would it be OK? General enough? Other propositions?

What about "DEFINE" / "UNDEF"?

The first is more C-like and macro substitution is really a C-like
For the other one ("UNDEF") I don't know if cpp have a macro to undefine
macros, but ... it seems to me a good choice, also "UNDEFINE" can be
good but it's a bit too verbose for my personal taste.


Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy | ICQ# 33538863 |
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: