Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Again on pattern matching and strings
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Again on pattern matching and strings
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:51:36AM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote:
> Would it be OK? General enough? Other propositions?

What about "DEFINE" / "UNDEF"?

The first is more C-like and macro substitution is really a C-like
construct.
For the other one ("UNDEF") I don't know if cpp have a macro to undefine
macros, but ... it seems to me a good choice, also "UNDEFINE" can be
good but it's a bit too verbose for my personal taste.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy
zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
"I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners