On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:17:53AM -0700, Chris Hecker wrote:
> The right thing is obviously to have a "library" (quoted because it could 
> be a packed object or a library) that allows merged code and interface 
> files, nested namespaces, and also supports not linking unused 
> code.  However, -pack is still _way_ better than nothing, so I think we 
> should all use it until the perfect solution comes along.  Hopefully it'll 
> be working on win32/msvc soon (I patched the compiler and sent the info to 
> Xavier).

Well, i was asking this thing, not for now, but as a future direction.

BTW, if you pack the .cmos into a single .cmo and then put this one in a
.cma, you should get the same benefit as what you describe, isn't it ?

Or maybe using -pack with -a should do this.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners