Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] ICFP 2002 Programming Contest Write-up?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: eijiro_sumii@a...
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ICFP 2002 Programming Contest Write-up?
> > Is the winning team planning to tell people anything interesting regarding
> > the contest?
> We are now preparing our web page.  Give us a little more time.  (Our
> boss got even angry that we spent time on the contest while we should
> have been busy with our own business...!)

OK, I took a glance at the scores in  We are yet to analyze them
in detail, but here are two obvious facts:

 - The scores of team #107 (us) and team #161 (the 2nd) are *very*
   close and rather incomparable in various scenarios.  The game was
   almost a draw, I would say.

 - On the other hand, the CPU times are quite different: we are
   more than 70 times faster!  This is surprising enough---even though
   speed was not a goal in the task and even though the CPU times may
   be somewhat imprecise as the judges say---considering the other
   entry is written in (raw) C.

By the way, we have to confess that we did not do so much *functional*
programming - our code is almost imperative.  This may be natural,
arguably, because the task was rather imperative involving a quite
"stateful" server.

Eijiro Sumii (
Research Associate, Department of Computer Science, University of Tokyo
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: