From: Frederic Tronel <Frederic.Tronel@inrialpes.fr>

> I reply to myself, since it seems I was too prompt to post on the list. 
> In fact after an ultimate try and few hundred megabytes of memory later,
> ocamlc.opt was able to produce the code.
> Sorry for the previous post. Is there any plan to improve the behaviour
> of the compiler in the future ? (if possible of course).

Any "unexpected" behaviour of the compiler can be seen as a bug, so
yes, if we understand what the problem is, it should be solved. Or at
least we could define workarounds to avoid stretching the compiler's
ability too much.

I believed that most problems with efficiency were already solved in
3.06, but you might have found a new one. Please write a bug report.

By the way several infinite loops were solved since 3.06, but this
doesn't seem to be your problem.

        Jacques Garrigue
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners