Browse thread
[Caml-list] Announcement: SpamOracle
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Announcement: SpamOracle |
I suggest we move this discussion off the Caml list, as it's not really relevant to Caml. Briefly: > That said, what i really wanted to know, is if you have some idea of how > spamoracle would scale in case of heavy load, if you use it to filter > mailing lists input for example ? For example, do you use it to filter > the ocaml mailing lists or something such ? We use SpamOracle to filter caml-bugs@inria.fr, with excellent results. caml-list@inria.fr is filtered by the "must be subscribed to post" policy of Majordomo. Generally speaking, SpamOracle runs faster than SpamAssassin, so if your e-mail system withstand the latter, it should withstand the former. Of course, if your mailserver receives 10000 messages a day, even SpamOracle could be computationally too expensive. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners