Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Pattern matching and strings
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alessandro Baretta <alex@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Pattern matching and strings (and a mini-bug in Scanf) |
Pierre Weis wrote: > [...] > I should say that I am reluctant to had a special typing rule for the > new specifier you proposed, when "%[\000-\255]" does perfectly the job > and does not require any addition to the type-checker nor to the > implementation of Scanf. > > Pierre Weis Why do you mention the type checker? Is each conversion specifier a special case for the type checker? Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners