Browse thread
[Caml-list] Again on pattern matching and strings
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Again on pattern matching and strings |
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:10:15AM +0200, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > Eh, no! This is really unacceptable as a general solution. > Of course, I could have coded my function this way, but this > technique is not scalable, especially from the perspective > of computational efficiency. Your code is compiled as a Yes, but your mail, expecially the part I quoted, complained about elegancy of the code, not about efficiency. > >Anyway from a more general point of view I'm also interested in seeing > >"aliasing" or constant definition in the compiler, it is of general > >interest, not only in pattern matching. > > To my great surprise, I'm unable to think of an example > relating to anything other than pattern matching. For example: the classic magic numbers problem used in almost all programs, for example a global variable "debug" which can be safely a constant (or an alias as you called it) instead of a global "let val". Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners