I propose that the number of occurence
of the '=' symbol encodes the max depth
of the recursive walk, when > 3.

For instance (=============) would return
true on lists which first 13 elements are equals
(with depth 12, of course)

:)


> On Monday 28 October 2002 03:38 am, Kontra, Gergely wrote:
>
> > I think this many changes is enough to release a new version with == and
> > === included :-)
>
> I think "===" is too much. And where is this going to stop? "========" a
> couple of revisions later? Think of the poor dyslexic children forced to take
> O'Caml in some French schools! ;-)
>
> Oleg
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners