Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Is Caml a fraud ( especially on Windows )? No.
- Beck01, Wolfgang
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Beck01, Wolfgang <BeckW@t...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Is Caml a fraud ( especially on Windows )? No. |
Pierre Weis wrote: > So, let me first recall here what was my message: > > I must warn you that Caml is a bit special: it is known as extremely > addictive. Many people that learnt it seriously, just don't want to > give it up and go back to real programming with *p++ or > null pointers ... > > You have to consider that before trying Caml: it could very well be > your last attempt to learn a new language. > > A better (and more cautious) approach would be to try all other > languages first (it ensures that the process will long for years) and > at the end, last but not least, try Caml :) > > All the best for trying to learn Caml! > I am a 'victim' of OCaml's addictiveness, but I agree with okzyk@interaccess.com in some points. The syntax is bit uncommon, but my main problem were the compiler error messages in the 3.02 version. Automatic type derivation is a concept that requires some acclimatisation. The debugger keeps telling me that there is no code where I want to set a breakpoint. As I am used to the 'printf debugging style, this is no real problem for me. However, after having mastered these obstacles, I use OCaml wherever possible. A SIP (IP telephony) client written in OCaml processes real-time audio without a problem and a OCaml SIP call generator outperforms some commercial tools. A code size comparison between my SIP parser (~5000 lines OCaml) and the corresponding parts of the free Vovida stack (~50 000 lines C++) speaks for itself. Some promlems remain: If I need co-workers in a project, teaching them OCaml would take too much time. It's not just teaching OCaml but teaching the functional paradigma as well. In a small commercial project, licensing was an issue. But yes, I've earned my department money in a project using OCaml. No, OCaml is not a fraud. -- Wolfgang Beck T-Systems GmbH 64295 Darmstadt Germany ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners