On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:38:48PM -0700, Chris Hecker wrote:

> >That is what -pack is for, isn't it ?

Has anyone though of a way to actually put submodules in separate files.
Ada allows this by placing the modules in separate files (you can still
code the submodule (package) in the one file).  The GNU Ada compiler
uses naming conventions to resolve this.

For example:

A file   std-list.ml

would be the module Std.List

We have to figure out how this interacts with the std.ml module, but
this is the general idea.

This is actually the single feature I've wished the ocaml module system
had.  The Ada approach also allows you to add submodules after the fact.

One proposal would be that before compiling std-list.ml, you have to
compile std.ml.  When std-list.cmo is linked, the new module (List) is
added to the std's names.  There is a possibility of duplicate names,
but camls seems to handle that normally by just replacing the previous
definition.

Dave Brown
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners