Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] On the equality of functional values
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-10-28 (06:16)
From: Alessandro Baretta <alex@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] On the equality of functional values

David Monniaux wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
> If I remember well, = is implemented by doing first a == (equality of
> pointers) test, and returning true if that test succeeds; otherwise,
> the more complex recursive equality test is performed, which fails with
> an exception if it encounters functional values.
> So if x and y are the same closure, x=y succeeds and yields the true
> value. Otherwise, it throws an exception.

This is what I suspected. I wonder if this behavior conforms 
to specification, or if it is an incidental concequence of 
the implementation of (=).


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: