Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Runtime overflow and what to do
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Runtime overflow and what to do |
> BTW, i compile the sparc debian package on a sparc64 box which > advertizes as a sparc box. Will i get access to the 64 bit integers in > this case or not ? The short answer is: it depends on the C compiler. Caml integers correspond to the C "long int" type, with one bit reserved for GC purposes. So, if the C compiler maps "long int" to 64-bit integers, you get 63-bit Caml ints; if it chooses 32-bit integers for "long int", you get 31-bit Caml ints. Often, this can be controlled via flags to the C compiler. The above is for the bytecode interpreter. For the native-code compiler, the current Sparc code emitter mandates 32-bit integers. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners