Browse thread
[Caml-list] CamlP4 Revised syntax comment
- brogoff@s...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | brogoff@s... |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] CamlP4 Revised syntax comment |
Skip this thread if syntax discussions don't interest you.
I was wondering what Revised users think about replacing comparison = with
==, as in Haskell, and giving phys ref equality some other name?
Why? Well, = is overloaded in OCaml/Revised for both binding and
comparison, and this change removes that overloading and uses a
fairly common (C, Haskell, Clean,...) symbol == for equality. Physical
reference equality should be used rather sparingly anyways so it is better
perhaps that it not even be infix.
Besides the extra keystroke, I couldn't think of good reasons why not.
Backwards compatibility is not much argument against changes in Revised
syntax.
Another possible change along the same lines is having =/= or /= for
inequality, which happens to look a little more like the mathematical
symbol.
-- Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners