Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Runtime overflow and what to do
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sven LUTHER <luther@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Runtime overflow and what to do |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:17:15AM +0200, Scott J, wrote: > Hi, > > So it is not easy, perhaps even impossible if the processor doesn't set a > flag . > > e.g. fact n begins first with a lis of negative numbers (after overflow) > then comes again a list with positive numbers and then it remains = 0 No, it is easy, but you have to check at each iteration, as was proposed here previously. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners