Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Alessandro Baretta <alex@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class?

Luc Maranget wrote:

> I am no industrial.
> But for hevea I stick to the following guidelines.
> - Always develop with the current distributed version.
> - Avoid new features as much as possible.
> - I check hevea at every compiler release.
> - I case of bug I favor work-arounds in my code over enforcing upgrade (at
> least until the next official Ocaml release).
> I do not think my statement can be considered ``official'', just
> common sense.
This is more or less what I've been doing up to now. Yet, 
the CVS version, is still tempting, in some respects. I'm am 
considering running a double installation setup with the 
official distro in /usr/bin and /usr/lib and the cvs in 
/opt/bin and /opt/lib. I could then test my code againsta 
the CVS snapshot by simply using a pinch of makefile magic.

The bottom line is that I don't like to work-arounds in my 
code. I'd like my code to be as obvious and idiomatic as 


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: