[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alessandro Baretta <alex@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Possible bug in module and class? |
Luc Maranget wrote: > > I am no industrial. > > But for hevea I stick to the following guidelines. > > - Always develop with the current distributed version. > - Avoid new features as much as possible. > - I check hevea at every compiler release. > - I case of bug I favor work-arounds in my code over enforcing upgrade (at > least until the next official Ocaml release). > > I do not think my statement can be considered ``official'', just > common sense. This is more or less what I've been doing up to now. Yet, the CVS version, is still tempting, in some respects. I'm am considering running a double installation setup with the official distro in /usr/bin and /usr/lib and the cvs in /opt/bin and /opt/lib. I could then test my code againsta the CVS snapshot by simply using a pinch of makefile magic. The bottom line is that I don't like to work-arounds in my code. I'd like my code to be as obvious and idiomatic as possible. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners