On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Dmitry Bely wrote:

> No way! It would only require adding "open Std" to the existing
> sources. But we can even introduce it transparately (although I think it is
> really not necessary): open Std by default (like Pervasives) and having a
> compiler flag "-nostd" (like "-nopervasives") to disable this auto open.

In which cases would we need -nostd ?  The only harm an "open" statement
can do is to hide previous definitions, but if it is inserted
automatically at the beginning, what's the problem ?

-- Alain

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners