Hi,

On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:01:57PM -0700, brogoff@speakeasy.net wrote:

> Of course, I'd prefer that it wasn't so, but I really want OCaml to
> be successful and if the status quo is not workable then let's
> return to the way it was and get back to hacking.

Don't worry: this problem does not stop me hacking on Camlp4! I have
been working on OCaml with Scheme syntax, for Bruno Verlyck (the
author of "Cash"), who experiments it.

I am developping it in the separated version of Camlp4, of course
(accessible under CVS).

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners