Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Runtime overflow and what to do
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Runtime overflow and what to do
> Which would be the relevant flags ?

No idea.  If you're interested, you figure them out :-)

> More importantly, i suppose code compiled in this fashion for 64 bit
> sparcs will not build on 32 bit sparc boxes, if these kind of boxes are
> still available anyway.

Yes (to both).  I still don't have access to a 64-bit SPARC machine.

> > The above is for the bytecode interpreter.  For the native-code
> > compiler, the current Sparc code emitter mandates 32-bit integers.
> Would it be much work to build a 64-bit integers target ?

A few days for someone who knows the SPARC64 assembly language well.

- Xavier Leroy
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: