Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why systhreads?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why systhreads? |
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Tim Freeman wrote: > > I tried OCaml in a non memory-consuming numerical applications on SMP. > >Seems to work well enough (100% load of all the processors). > > Wrong metric. You want speedup, not CPU utilization. You can get CPU > utilization for free by running an infinite loop. Did the application > run anywhere near N times faster when you were using N processors? Yes. But, >80% of the system time was in external C functions, without any memory management. So, really wrong metric... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners