English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why systhreads?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-11-29 (13:25)
From: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why systhreads?
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Tim Freeman wrote:

> > I tried OCaml in a non memory-consuming numerical applications on SMP.
> >Seems to work well enough (100% load of all the processors).
> Wrong metric.  You want speedup, not CPU utilization.  You can get CPU
> utilization for free by running an infinite loop. Did the application
> run anywhere near N times faster when you were using N processors?

 Yes. But, >80% of the system time was in external C functions, without
any memory management. So, really wrong metric...

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners