English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Quick spamoracle questions
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-11-15 (17:23)
From: Benjamin C. Pierce <bcpierce@s...>
Subject: [Caml-list] Quick spamoracle questions
Quick question about spamoracle: Is it important to try to keep the
number of sample spams and sample non-spams roughly the same when
constructing the database?  (E.g., if I present it with 100 times as many
non-spam examples as spam examples, will that tend to make it very
conservative, or even too conservative?)

And another (or maybe it's the same one): When it correctly judges a
message to be spam, is it a good idea to add this message to the database
as a new spam example, to reinforce what happened?  

Thanks for a great tool, Xavier!


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners