>proposal would be to use such namespace ids as Com.Baretta.VSG, 
>Com.Baretta.Lib and Com.Baretta.Afo. There's nothing wrong with this, but 
>it is much less intuitiva and comprehensible than 
>"http://priv.baretta.com/afo", "http://priv.baretta.com/lib", 
>"http://priv.baretta.com/svg". This latter schema allows for the 
>identification of a URL -- in this case a private one on an intranet -- 
>associated with the project. Further, such a schema allows for multiple 
>versions of the same sw -- i.e. a private alpha such as the above, and a 
>public release -- to coexist without interfering with each other.

I think his proposal would be Com.Baretta.Priv.Afo, etc., so multiple 
versions would work fine.

I'm not giving an opinion on the matter (haven't thought about it), just 
pointing out that I assumed his 'grammar' for the namespaces was recursive.

Chris



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners