[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Pcre Confusion. |
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Ceri Storey wrote: > Hi. I don't understand how pcre_full split is supposed to return Group > results: > > # let rex = regexp "([A-Z][a-z]*)|([0-9]+)";; > val rex : Pcre.regexp = <abstr> > # Pcre.full_split ~rex:rex "Foo bar 42";; > - : Pcre.split_result list = > [Delim "Foo"; Group (1, "Foo"); NoGroup; Text " bar "; Delim "42"] > > I don't see why there's no Group for the last Delim. If someone could > enlighten me, I'd be most grateful :) Simple reason: it's a bug :-) The true result is: [Pcre.Delim "Foo"; Pcre.Group (1, "Foo"); Pcre.NoGroup; Pcre.Text " bar "; Pcre.Delim "42"; Pcre.NoGroup; Pcre.Group (2, "42")] I have patched PCRE-OCaml so if you want to fix this, please upgrade! Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners