Jacques Garrigue wrote:

> You can write
> 
> # (f ~a:2.0) 2.0 4.0;;
> 
> The parenthesis creates staged applications, one labelled-style and
> the other unlabelled-style.

Is this only type-checking stuff, or does it impact 
code-generation? Namely, does this build a new closure for 
(f ~a:2.0) and then apply it to 2.0 and 4.0, or does it 
recognize that this is a direct invocation of f, thus 
skipping the closure creation?

This might be a relevant issue for inner loops, so I thought 
I might ask.

Alex

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners