Lauri Alanko wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:34:45PM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
> 
>>"http://priv.baretta.com/afo", 
>>"http://priv.baretta.com/lib", 
>>"http://priv.baretta.com/svg".
> 
> 
> Pardon, but I at least don't find it particularly intuitive to find the
> name of a network protocol in every namespace identifier. Domain and
> path, yes.
> 
> 
> Lauri Alanko
> la@iki.fi

I agree with you, but unless we agree that any resource or 
documentation available on the defined namespace can be 
reached via http at the specified address/path, then we must 
specify the protocol. Choosing http as a standard protocol 
for acessing documentation is definitely reasonable now, but 
in the future other protocols might emerge and dominate the 
scene.

I'm willing to go with "xxx.domain.com/path" if there is 
some consensus about this form of namespace identification.

Alex

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners