Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why systhreads?
-
Lauri Alanko
- Sven Luther
- Vitaly Lugovsky
- Christopher Quinn
- Xavier Leroy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why systhreads? |
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Lauri Alanko wrote: > A simple, fundamental question: why is native-code threading done using > system threads? Why isn't pure user-level scheduling used as with > bytecode? How will you manage SMP scheduling then? May be, smthng like OpenMP will be nice, but it's not so generic as just native threads. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners