Browse thread
[Caml-list] Why systhreads?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why systhreads? |
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Xavier Leroy wrote: > In summary: there is no SMP support in OCaml, and it is very very > unlikely that there will ever be. If you're into parallelism, better > investigate message-passing interfaces. To make at least some users happy: it is indeed possible to exploit SMP-machines with native threads in OCaml, but those benefits only occur when calling external functions that do not interfere with the OCaml runtime. E.g. LACAML (the LAPACK-interface for OCaml) makes use of this, which means that you can, say, crunch several matrices in parallel. Due to the elegant handling of threads in OCaml, this is much nicer to do than in C. Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners