Jeffrey Palmer wrote:
> On Monday 04 November 2002 02:07 am, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
> 
>>I agree with you, but unless we agree that any resource or
>>documentation available on the defined namespace can be
>>reached via http at the specified address/path, then we must
>>specify the protocol.
> 
> 
> Interesting. Is this model in common usage elsewhere (i.e., relying on a 
> namespace specification to indicate documentation repositories)?
> 

It is the de facto standard with XML namespaces, although 
the W3C does not mandate it.

Alex

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners