On Monday 04 November 2002 02:07 am, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
> I agree with you, but unless we agree that any resource or
> documentation available on the defined namespace can be
> reached via http at the specified address/path, then we must
> specify the protocol.

Interesting. Is this model in common usage elsewhere (i.e., relying on a 
namespace specification to indicate documentation repositories)?

I've personally never come across it in other programming languages, but then 
again, I obviously haven't used all of the languages out there... (and I'm 
guessing that the Java org.ocaml.etc hierarchy doesn't fulfill this 
requirement?)

	- jeff


-- 
The river is moving.
The blackbird must be flying.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners