Browse thread
[Caml-list] float pretty-printing precision, once more.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] float pretty-printing precision, once more. |
On Tuesday, Dec 10, 2002, at 00:04 Europe/Paris,
jeanmarc.eber@lexifi.com wrote:
> caml 3.06+1:
[string_of_float loses precision on floating-point numbers]
In the current working version (3.06+18), the precision used by
string_of_float has been increased to 17 digits. I *think* this
is enough to represent all the double-precision floating-point
numbers:
Objective Caml version 3.06+18 (2002-11-07)
# let f = 1. /. 86400.;;
val f : float = 1.1574074074074073e-05
# let s = string_of_float f;;
val s : string = "1.1574074074074073e-05"
# let f1 = float_of_string s;;
val f1 : float = 1.1574074074074073e-05
# f1 = f;;
- : bool = true
# f1 -. f;;
- : float = 0.
However, it has the unfortunate side-effect of revealing this
awful truth about FP numbers: many "interesting" numbers are
impossible to represent in floating-point. For example:
# 0.1;;
- : float = 0.10000000000000001
There is no floating-point number equal to 0.1 and the
best approximation you can get is 0.10000000000000001.
I expect this will quickly become a much-used FAQ entry...
I don't know if we will keep this change for the next release
of O'Caml. But you can always use (Printf.sprintf "%.17g")
instead of string_of_float, and you'll get all the digits,
significant or not.
-- Damien
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners