Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] labels overhead
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Oleg <oleg_inconnu@m...>
Subject: [Caml-list] labels overhead
Hi

In his book Paradigms of AI Programming, P. Norvig mentions that Lisp 
functions with keyword arguments [1] suffer a large degree of overhead and 
that this may also be true for optional and rest arguments, although to a 
lesser degree [2], depending on the platform [3]. 

I'm wondering if the same is true for O'Caml. I'm guessing that it's not, 
since complete function applications using labels can be transformed into 
"normal" function calls at compile time. Am I right?

Thanks,
Oleg

[1] Called "arguments with labels" in O'Caml
[2] In Lisp, optional arguments do not have labels associated with them
[3] Chapter 10.3
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners