Browse thread
[Caml-list] Camlp4: generating printers of types
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4: generating printers of types |
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:33:23AM -0800, Ken Rose wrote:
> and so on into gen_print_type. Or do I not understand what $uid:x$
> does?
If x is a string <:expr< $uid:x$ >> produces "the uppercase identifier
named by the value of x". If x is "Foo", this produces the identifier
Foo. Notice that it works even if x does not contain an uppercase
identifier: OCaml with interpret it as a module name or as a
constructor name (depending on its position), whatever its value.
Sorry, for your Baz.Baz.t, you need your <:ctyp< $uid:m2$.$uid:m$.$lid:s$ >>
The better is to use an iterator, or use the recursion to treat the
general case.
> > In Revised syntax, they are like in normal syntax, but the parentheses
> > are compulsory.
>
> Here, I want to match
> type t = int * int
> within gen_one_print_fun, to produce a printer instead of "failwith...".
In Normal syntax, you can write "int * int" but inside the predefined
quotations of AST, you have to use the Revised syntax. See the chapter
about it in the reference manual.
You must write it <:ctyp< (int * int) >>. And if tl is a list of ctyp,
you can obtain the type tuple of this list of types with:
<:ctyp< ($list:tl$) >>
See the chapter about AST quotations.
> > This message of OCaml just means that there are syntactic restrictions
> > of the "let rec". In this case, you should produce either a "let" without
> > "rec" or, an eta extension: "let rec print_t x = print_int x".
>
> I'd suspected that, though I'm still curious as to why that's so.
Damien Doligez answered you on that point; this is typing and
therefore not the work of Camlp4.
> Still, what I really want is a generally useful tool to produce these
> useful functions, without having to spend too much time right now
> learning camlp4. It's for my regular work, where I'm building a
> compiler for a DSL. I don't understand camlp4 well enough to know how
> to suppress the "rec", and I'm hoping to avoid learning, at least for a
> while. It's a great tool, but I have only so much time.
Well, if you don't have time to look at it, I can help.
--
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners