Browse thread
[Caml-list] Cross-platform DBM equivalent?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dmitry Bely <dbely@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Cross-platform DBM equivalent? |
Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr> writes: >> > >I am developing an application that needs fast access to persistent >> > >configuration data, and I thought that DBM might be a good way to >> > >provide that functionality ... > > As far as I know the best (and simpler) way to do this for reasonable > number of URLs bindings (say thousands but not millions) is to create > a Hashtlbl.t or Map.t and dump it to file using output_value (then > read it back with input_value). In any case, I would start with this > solution, since it provides cross-platform persistency with 4 lines of > Caml code. A fast and easy way to obtain fast and good results! Can marshalling functions output be different for different versions of Ocaml? If I try to feed incompatible data (e.g. form the previous version) to input_value, what I will have then - segfault? If so, they can hardly be used for saving configuration data. - Dmitry Bely ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners