Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] First alpha release of LablGTK2
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin <snob@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about optionnal argument ?
On Friday 27 December 2002 20:11, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> I don't know how glVertex is implemented on the C side, but if it is
> only copying its data to a queue, then we may want to optimize the
> marshalling.  But again it depends how your data was layed out
> originally: if it is in a table, the vector form is best as no copy is
> needed. If you have to compute it for each call, then the flat unboxed
> calls are best.
>

This discussion is pointless. There will be almost no perfomance gain after 
gl[Vertex,Normal,Color,etc] call optimization. Immediate mode is slow by 
design. One must use "Vertex Arrays" instead. VAR/VAO will give even more 
speedup.

Nickolay
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners