Browse thread
[Caml-list] speed
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oleg <oleg_inconnu@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed ) |
On Saturday 04 January 2003 01:31 pm, Xavier Leroy wrote: > Apparently, the ocamlopt-generated code > offers less instruction-level parallelism than the g++-generated code > for the float computations. Still, I haven't really understood where > the factor of 2 comes from. It's been a couple of weeks. I'm wondering if you got any new insights into this? Just as wild guess: the code contains calls to "sin" and "cos" on the same value. Perhaps GCC manages to optimize those into one call to "sincos" ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners