Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] let rec
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] let rec
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 03:38 PM, Mike Potanin wrote:

> The similar problem arises in a case
> let ring l = let rec r = l@r in r
> OCaml type system can not understand that the design is safe.

But it is not unconditionally safe.  Its safety depends on how
you defined the @ function.  O'Caml doesn't want to look at
the definition of @ because separate compilation is a very
important feature.

-- Damien

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: