> BTW, a dual licence GPL+proprietary, is even better then for you than
> the BSd, since you can release the software under GPL for everyone, and
> then have another proprietary release for folk not wanting the GPL. With
> a BSD licence, this is not the case, because anyone can take the code
> and make anything they want with it.


I look at this differently. A person wishing to make money
by supplying expertise will probably do best providing
the software without encumberence.

Example: Python.



-- 
John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@ozemail.com.au
snail:10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.
voice:61-2-9660-0850


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners