Browse thread
[Caml-list] speed
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@q...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml |
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Xavier Leroy wrote: > Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin asks: > > > But then this brings up the issue of conformity vr.s performance. For > > example- the x86 has its 80-bit FP registers in 8087-legacy mode, but > > 64-bit registers if you're using SSE2. And PowerPC and PA-RISC both have > > extended precision fused multiply-adds (that keep higher precision, i.e. > > don't round, between the multiply and the adds). > > > For that matter, could a > > "conforming" implementation of Ocaml use the 32-bit single precision SSE-1 > > registers? > I think these were me. But thanks for answering them. BTW, I'm willing to try out your code. I'm writting some numerical code for Ocaml, and like all the optimization I can get :-). Brian ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners