Thanks, I was aware of that email. My question was really much more
restrictive. I am only trying to run C-code in parallel. Of course the
C-code (with no callbacks) is being called from caml. Please see Markus'
message which my first email referred to.

Thanks,

--shiv--


On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:32, Chris Uzdavinis wrote:
> Shivkumar Chandrasekaran <shiv@ece.ucsb.edu> writes:
> 
> > Not sure if this issue from an earlier discussion was fully resolved
> > or not. But I seem to have the same problem as discussed by Markus
> > Mottl (see attachment below) on Mac OS X 10.2.4 on a dual processor
> > G4 machine. An earlier message in that thread mentioned that there
> > was no such problem on dual-processor Linux machines.
> > 
> > I have two questions:
> > 
> > 1. Has anybody else figured out how to get parallelism using native
> > threads on Mac OS X?
> > 
> > 2. Will I get the parallelism if I switch to LinuxPPC?
> 
> Here's the best/most detailed answer to your question that I've seen:
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?P28725B83
> 
> ...which expands to:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fa.dlqoshv.1a66ho7%40ifi.uio.no&output=gplain
> 
> -- 
> Chris
> 
-- 
Professor Shivkumar Chandrasekaran            || phn: 805.893.7542
Electrical & Computer Engineering Department  || fax: 805.893.3262
University of California                      || Office: 3109, Eng. I
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9560                  || email:
shiv@ece.ucsb.edu

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners