Browse thread
[Caml-list] Request: matrix_init function in Array
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Noel Welsh <noelwelsh@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: feature priorities (multithreading) |
--- Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com> wrote: > I've toyed occassional with the idea of having the > compiler or run time > environment add synchronization automatically. I believe the SAC language http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/~sacbase/ automatically parallelises matrix operations to take advantage of SMP machines. I believe this does at least part of what you're interesting in. The alternative is to have no synchronisation, wich is essentially what Erlang does. Message passing is the only way threads can communicate, and messages are asynchronous and lossy. An Erlang process is purely functional so there can be no race conditions. Noel __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners