Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] native threads not parallel?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] native threads not parallel? |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, shivkumar chandrasekaran wrote: > If I am recalling correctly, Xavier has mentioned before that in > *native-code* (see subject) ocaml will allow C code to run in parallel. > Markus' email was precisely on that point as was mine. I have C code > that I would like to execute on a processor different from the ocaml > thread one. Apparently, as I gather from the cited email of Markus > Mottl, this did occur (at least on some dual processor Linux machines) > when the corresponding C code was bracketed with "enter/leaving_blocking > section ()" calls, and, *I assume*, calling the C-code from a separate > ocaml thread using Thread.create. Looking back at the old discussion, I remember that this was really a Solaris-only problem. Executing C-code from OCaml in parallel (requires native threads, of course) by using enter_blocking_section and leave_blocking_section appropriately should work without problems on other platforms, well, at least Linux. As Jacques correctly pointed out, of course, messing with the OCaml-heap within such sections, e.g. by calling callbacks, is a guarantee for sudden death. Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners