Browse thread
[Caml-list] Alternative proposal: COAN
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sven Luther <luther@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Alternative proposal: COAN |
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:13:55AM -0500, Chet Murthy wrote: > > >>>>> "NC" == Nicolas Cannasse <warplayer@free.fr> writes: > > NC> No, I haven't used OCamlMakefile ( is is working with NMAKE ? > NC> ) And no, I don't think using findlib would be *near-ideal* > NC> since it isn't ported on all platforms ( Windows at least, > NC> what about MacOs ? ). > > Ahhh ... Windows. Oh, yeah, I guess, well, yeah, you're probably out > of luck until somebody decides (like ActiveState did for Perl and > Python - and note until they came along, that you were equally > out-of-luck with Perl/Python) to port all the Caml tools nicely. > > Until then, well, hmmmm ... I wonder how easy it would be to use > Cygwin ... > > Regardless, I think that solving this problem on UNIXes is already > sufficiently valuable that more-or-less standardizing on OCamlMakefile > and findlib would be a big step forward. And as said, you could simply cross compile the windwos/mingw or something such version, i think there is a cross compiling environment for mingw available as a debian package. If i had time i would look if it is possible to use it for crosscompiling my debian packages, that would be nice :))) Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners