Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] OCaml standard library improvement
-
Amit Dubey
-
John Max Skaller
- Sven Luther
- Lauri Alanko
-
John Max Skaller
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Lauri Alanko <la@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCaml standard library improvement |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:56:00PM +1100, John Max Skaller wrote: > It's not enough to just start a sourceforge account. > Some strict policy is needed for managing contributions. > The C++ Boost is an example of an informal collaborative effort > and is worth looking at. The Library Working Group of the C and > C++ ISO committees are another, and are also worth considering. Another thing to look at is the SRFI system for Scheme <http://srfi.schemers.org/>. It is a systematic yet fairly informal and accessible procedure for defining language and library extensions, and it has proven to produce well-specified and fairly clean designs (along with implementations, of course). Lauri Alanko la@iki.fi ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners