Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] OCaml standard library improvement
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Lauri Alanko <la@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml standard library improvement
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:56:00PM +1100, John Max Skaller wrote:
> It's not enough to just start a sourceforge account.
> Some strict policy is needed for managing contributions.
> The C++ Boost is an example of an informal collaborative effort
> and is worth looking at. The Library Working Group of the C and
> C++ ISO committees are another, and are also worth considering.

Another thing to look at is the SRFI system for Scheme
<>. It is a systematic yet fairly informal and
accessible procedure for defining language and library extensions, and
it has proven to produce well-specified and fairly clean designs (along
with implementations, of course).

Lauri Alanko
To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: