Browse thread
[Caml-list] interface printing without generating object code?
-
Chris Hecker
-
Emmanuel Renieris
-
Chris Hecker
- Emmanuel Renieris
- jeanmarc.eber@l...
- Xavier Leroy
-
Chris Hecker
-
Emmanuel Renieris
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Emmanuel Renieris <er@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] interface printing without generating object code? |
It does produce both files. I will second the request. Under linux,
(unix in general, I think) it is now impossible to do
ocamlc -c -i foo.ml > foo.mli
because when the compiler sees foo.ml, there is a foo.mli already,
but there is no accompanying .cmi.
-- Manos
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:09:56PM -0800, Chris Hecker wrote:
>
> >What do you want that's not
> > ocamlc -i -c foo.ml -o /dev/null
> >?
>
> I tried that (well, the windows version with NUL) and it didn't work. It
> still generated both a cmi and a cmo. Doesn't yours generate a cmi at
> least, even on unix? I want no output except stdout.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners