Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] native threads not parallel?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Uzdavinis <chris@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] native threads not parallel? |
Shivkumar Chandrasekaran <shiv@ece.ucsb.edu> writes: > Not sure if this issue from an earlier discussion was fully resolved > or not. But I seem to have the same problem as discussed by Markus > Mottl (see attachment below) on Mac OS X 10.2.4 on a dual processor > G4 machine. An earlier message in that thread mentioned that there > was no such problem on dual-processor Linux machines. > > I have two questions: > > 1. Has anybody else figured out how to get parallelism using native > threads on Mac OS X? > > 2. Will I get the parallelism if I switch to LinuxPPC? Here's the best/most detailed answer to your question that I've seen: http://makeashorterlink.com/?P28725B83 ...which expands to: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fa.dlqoshv.1a66ho7%40ifi.uio.no&output=gplain -- Chris ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners