Browse thread
[Caml-list] mutually dependent modules
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | cashin@c... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] mutually dependent modules |
Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu> writes: ... > let _ = A.f2 := B.f2 I've seen this before, but why is it preferable to this? A.f2 := B.f2 There's an article on comp.lang.ml where Xavier Leroy mentions this syntax as a way to get module initialization code to run ... but I get the impression that folks are using it when it's semantically equivalent to the same thing with the "let _ = " omitted entirely. -- --Ed L Cashin | PGP public key: ecashin@uga.edu | http://noserose.net/e/pgp/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners