Browse thread
[Caml-list] mutually dependent modules
-
Giuseppe Lo Presti
-
Chris Hecker
-
Issac Trotts
-
cashin@c...
-
Issac Trotts
- Michal Moskal
- Christophe TROESTLER
-
Issac Trotts
-
cashin@c...
-
Issac Trotts
-
Chris Hecker
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe TROESTLER <debian00@t...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] mutually dependent modules |
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > > I've seen both, but I now avoid the "let _ = " expression because if > you leave it out then ocamlc gives a warning when you don't supply > all the arguments to a function. The warning is good to have. Use let () = ... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners