Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] mutually dependent modules
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Christophe TROESTLER <debian00@t...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mutually dependent modules
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> 
> I've seen both, but I now avoid the "let _ = " expression because if
> you leave it out then ocamlc gives a warning when you don't supply
> all the arguments to a function.  The warning is good to have.

Use
	let () = ...
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners