On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Sven Luther wrote:

> The best idea is to use the same licence the ocaml runtime currently
> uses :

This is by far the best idea.  This means we don't have to relicense the 
software to move it between the user library and the standard library.  
Relicensing is a bitch, to put it simply.  If the two licenses are 
congruent from day one, no relicensing is needed (and moving code is loads 
easier).

> 
> The Library is distributed under the terms of the GNU Library General
> Public License version 2 (found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2
> on debian systems).
> 

This argument would have convinced me to use a different license thant he 
LGPL.

Brian


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners