Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] User library license
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-02-23 (19:47)
From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@q...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] User library license
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Sven Luther wrote:

> The best idea is to use the same licence the ocaml runtime currently
> uses :

This is by far the best idea.  This means we don't have to relicense the 
software to move it between the user library and the standard library.  
Relicensing is a bitch, to put it simply.  If the two licenses are 
congruent from day one, no relicensing is needed (and moving code is loads 

> The Library is distributed under the terms of the GNU Library General
> Public License version 2 (found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2
> on debian systems).

This argument would have convinced me to use a different license thant he 


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: